I'm looking at things for what OS rfxcom and is not really the point of coding.
rfxcom on the list when I look I see WGR918 assist and a Internet WGR968. Image in identical, what are the differences.
Same thermometer for various things. What eg adding N?
Myself struggling through the lists before I reach the following list of preferred models, right then with the vision of the people who have been running eea? <b><i>(google translated)</i></b>
UV sensor Oregon-UVN128
Windmeter Oregon-WGR800 of Oregon-WGR918 (zonnecel) of Oregon-WTGR800 (met temp/hygro)
Binnenbarometer Oregon-BTHR918N
Binnen temp/hygro Oregon-THGR810 (10 kanaal's)
Buiten temp/hygro Oregon-THGR228N (weersbestendig)
Poolsensor Oregon-THWR288A (blauw) of Oregon-THWR800 (groen)
codering Oregon Scientific?
- b_weijenberg
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 1746
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:32 pm
- Location: Netherlands
codering Oregon Scientific?
Edwin,
Please use English in this part of the forum.
Almost all Oregon sensors are now received by the latest RFXCOM receiver versions. There are a lot of types that produce the same sensor ID. Not all sensor ID's are known in the software yet. Best is to test the sensor and if the sensor is received but not decoded by RFreceiver, send the received data to support rfxcom.com and a big chance that the sensor will be added as supported.
Note: there is always a risk that Oregon produces a sensor that cannot be received or decoded by software!
Bert
Please use English in this part of the forum.
Almost all Oregon sensors are now received by the latest RFXCOM receiver versions. There are a lot of types that produce the same sensor ID. Not all sensor ID's are known in the software yet. Best is to test the sensor and if the sensor is received but not decoded by RFreceiver, send the received data to support rfxcom.com and a big chance that the sensor will be added as supported.
Note: there is always a risk that Oregon produces a sensor that cannot be received or decoded by software!
Bert
codering Oregon Scientific?
Oeps, did i wrote dutch? In that case thanks for translating 
Besides the fact that rfxcom can receive most sensors (thats very nice) i got lost in the jungle of veriaties of the sensors that exists. All having the same or almost the same decription i was wondering if anyone knows the difference between the models.

Besides the fact that rfxcom can receive most sensors (thats very nice) i got lost in the jungle of veriaties of the sensors that exists. All having the same or almost the same decription i was wondering if anyone knows the difference between the models.
codering Oregon Scientific?
Thanks!
Depends what you want, go for the latest models
A lot of Oregon sensors are not for sale anymore but still supported by rfxcom
Go for temp and hygro together in one sensor, there is also one with a separate sensor which is very handy for remote measuring.
<hr noshade size="1"><font size="1">Pieter Knuvers
http://www.bwired.nl <i>Online House in the netherlands. Domotica, Home Automation.</i></font id="size1">
Depends what you want, go for the latest models
A lot of Oregon sensors are not for sale anymore but still supported by rfxcom
Go for temp and hygro together in one sensor, there is also one with a separate sensor which is very handy for remote measuring.
<hr noshade size="1"><font size="1">Pieter Knuvers
http://www.bwired.nl <i>Online House in the netherlands. Domotica, Home Automation.</i></font id="size1">
codering Oregon Scientific?
that's the start of the Q. How does the coding work so you you what the latest model is, or is there not a logic in? btw i didn't find a module with a separate sensor, which model is this? Must say i took the rfxcom list as starting point.